data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cda7e/cda7ebd4e3399cc130896e9c9073194c21b379a9" alt="Breakwaters review"
The berm width and berm level (with respect to the still water level) have lower impact on the predicted overtopping compared to that of the crest freeboard. The sensitivity of overtopping to wave steepness varies from being insensitive, constant, or a function of dimensionless crest freeboard across the formulae analysed. The dimensionless crest freeboard is the most significant factor influencing the predicted overtopping rate. A sensitivity analysis was conducted on selected models in order to study the influence of input variables on estimated overtopping discharge. N2 - This paper reviews the available models for the estimation of mean wave overtopping rate at berm breakwaters. N1 - Includes bibliographical references. T2 - Review and sensitivity analysis of prediction models
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7aa64/7aa6496fc19763a3afe14b0e093d85705f3d1f92" alt="breakwaters review breakwaters review"
T1 - Wave overtopping at berm breakwaters The results of this study throws light on the disparities in accounting the influence of variables, in the estimated overtopping rate at berm breakwaters, using the existing prediction models. The Van der Meer and Janssen (1994) formula showed oversensitivity to the major governing variables. (2007) and the Lykke Andersen (2006) formula were found to be in more reasonable agreement with those of the experimental data. Among the models, the sensitivity estimations using the artificial neural network of Van Gent et al. The sensitivities of the estimated overtopping rates to the governing variables were compared with those obtained from experimental data. Additionally, the case study demonstrated inconsistencies among the models for predicted overtopping. A case study on the sensitivity of predicted overtopping was carried out on Sirevag and Bakkafjordur berm breakwaters and it illustrated that the existing models are most sensitive to the variables of dimensionless crest freeboard, when it is greater than 1.0 and dimensionless berm width, when it is greater than 2.0. The results of this study throws light on the disparities in accounting the influence of variables, in the estimated overtopping rate at berm breakwaters, using the existing prediction models.Ībstract = "This paper reviews the available models for the estimation of mean wave overtopping rate at berm breakwaters.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77b66/77b66aa91e9bc13f160d89cb082384c4afa9fae9" alt="breakwaters review breakwaters review"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bf51d/bf51d94d2abfccd782c84d5d98c2abe39af5e428" alt="breakwaters review breakwaters review"
This paper reviews the available models for the estimation of mean wave overtopping rate at berm breakwaters.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cda7e/cda7ebd4e3399cc130896e9c9073194c21b379a9" alt="Breakwaters review"